"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > > Hm? I don't see any improvement there: >
I was referening this sentence, though I am not sure why that's the expectation: > > "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote > If the patch worked, the first and third times will be similar, and > the second time will be high. > -- After patch -- real 0m1.275s user 0m0.097s sys 0m0.160s real 0m4.063s user 0m0.663s sys 0m0.377s real 0m1.259s user 0m0.073s sys 0m0.160s ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
