Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> It looks to me like the diffs are consistent with the idea that the >>> test is using a copy of dblink that predates this patch ...
>> I would think that the diffs would be significantly larger if that were >> the case. In fact, when was PG_MODULE_MAGIC first made mandatory? > Good point. So then why the failure? What's even more interesting is that there are now three later runs of HEAD on osprey, and none of them failed. So unless Remi's been fooling with the environment on that machine, this was a one-shot irreproducible failure. That's disturbing in a different way ... http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_history.pl?nm=osprey&br=HEAD regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
