Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The patch to c.h certainly had no compunction about possibly changing
>> the behavior for Cygwin:
> Maybe we need to divorce Cygwin and Win32.
That seems like probably an overreaction. The impression I got was that
this patch had actually moved the MSVC port quite a long way towards
being like the Cygwin port. It was just sloppy :-(.
Magnus, this was your patch, can you see about fixing the collateral
damage to the Cygwin build?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
