On Thu, 2006-06-29 at 21:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > One easy thing that would be worth trying is to build with > --enable-cassert and see if any Asserts get provoked during the
> A couple other things to try, given that you can provoke the failure > fairly easily: > . . . > 1. In studying the code, it bothers me a bit that P_NEW is the same as > InvalidBlockNumber. The intended uses of P_NEW appear to be adequately > . . . > 2. I'm also eyeing this bit of code in hio.c: > > If someone else has just extended the relation, it's possible that this > will allow a process to get to the page before the intended extender has > . . . We tried all of these suggestions and still get the problem. Nothing interesting in the log file so I guess the Asserts did not fire. We are going to try experimenting with different kernels now. Unless anyone has any other suggestions. __ Marc
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
