Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >> If this is chosen as the preferred path, we could get the list bot to > >> add "Reply-To: pghackers" in pgsql-patches postings to help push > >> discussions there. I'd vote for doing the same in pgsql-committers, > >> which also gets its share of non-null discussion content. > > > > that is a very easy and quick change ... but wasn't doing that brought > > up before and alot of ppl were against that? > > > > If nobody objects within, say, the next 24 hours ... ? I'll enabled > > that one both ... > > > > Don't be surprised if there are objections - this is one of those things > like emacs vs vi that stirs up religious debate.
If we change Reply-To:, does it prevent replies to the original author? If so, that seems like a problem, particularly if they are not subscribed to the patches list. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
