On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Second, its assuming that Thomas, or any other pl/java developer, *isn't*
going to watching for any changes to the API fairly closely, considering
they know it does happen, and, therefore, won't make a change to their
development code to accommodate that when the time comes ...
As we have explained before, there really isn't an API in any meaningful
sense. Thomas will undoubtedly be vigilant, but the real danger is that
something non-obvious will change and break stuff.
But, as Tom has already explained, *he's* not going to make changes
pl/java if its committed ... how many will even have java (or gcj) to even
test it to see if its broken?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
