-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Tom Lane Sent: Sun 7/16/2006 3:29 PM To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it > AFAICT, snake is the only Windows machine that > actually runs the buildfarm on a regular schedule, and even it is just > running once a day. I can bump that up as high as you'd like within reason. 4? 6 times a day? I have spare licences for most versions of Windows as well, so if Microsoft's virtual server product is not too expensive for us I can probably add a few platform variations to that box. I'll look into it. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
- [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack of it Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack... Kris Jurka
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or ... Dave Page
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or ... Joshua D. Drake
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support,... Nathan Buchanan
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or ... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or lack... Dave Page
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or ... Petr Jelinek
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support,... Dave Page
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm supp... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support,... Magnus Hagander
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support, or ... Andrew Dunstan
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm support,... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm supp... Josh Berkus
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm... Dave Page
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm supp... Stefan Kaltenbrunner
- Re: [HACKERS] Windows buildfarm supp... Dave Page