Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 18:49 schrieb Alvaro Herrera: > >>Side question -- is it plRuby or PL/Ruby? We should be consistent. I > >>just noticed the top-level README file has all the wrong names -- what > >>is "pl/c" for starters? Or plPgsql? We've _never_ used those names. > > > >I'm beginning to think that this is part of some obscure plot by Joshua > >Drake to confuse people. > > I sincerely hope you are kidding.
I understand that he is. > >I advise all committers not to take any documentation > >patches from him without careful scrutiny. > > Gah... aren't you just all sour grapes. The README was reviewed by > several people, in fact it went through two versions to the patches list. I saw those fly by and my gut feeling was "whoever commits this is _certainly_ going to fix it". I'm not sure why I didn't comment on it. > Sorry that nobody caught it (including myself), but good lord it isn't > that big of a deal. Consistency is important. It may not be _THAT_ big a deal, but we should be at least a little careful. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
