Is it intentional that effective_cache_size is a real (as opposed to integer)? The initial revision of guc.c already has it that way, so it was probably blindly adapted from the previous adhockery that had all planner variables be doubles.
-- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
