"Marko Kreen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a chance that the locking variant will be replaced by > non-locking variant,
No, I don't think so. Given that the concurrent form is much slower
(extra table scan) and can't be wrapped into a transaction block,
it'll always be a special option.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
