On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 08:42:23AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 10:01:30AM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > I found maybe interesting article > > http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/db2/library/techarticle/dm-0603wasserman2/ > > That for the article. I had been meaning to look at DB2, and it gave me a > quick summary. > > What I get from the article, though, is that DB2 is more modularized than > PostgreSQL, however, it has concurrency issues. Is this true? Anybody allowed > to comment on the peformance of small-sized (~1 million rows) databases? > > I'm not seeing a compelling reason to switch.
Unless it's changed recently, it uses shared read locks, so yes, there's definately concurrency issues to think about. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq