Jim Nasby wrote:
> First, +1 on Josh B.'s point about trying out Trac, since it's  
> already up and running. Josh D., can you just turn that on? (BTW, is  
> trac linked off http://commandprompt.com anywhere? I had to google to  
> find it yesterday...)
> 
> On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Robert Treat wrote:
> >>> Wouldn't a thread reply saying something like "Bruce, can we add  
> >>> this as a
> >>> TODO with the following wording: blah blah blah"  likely suffice?
> >
> > That's pretty much how it's done now ...
> 
> Robert missed the point I was making... there is value in keeping  
> track of ideas that may not have enough consensus to be a valid TODO  
> yet, but could still be useful.

It seems some people like the authoritative TODO list, and others want a
TODO wiki that they can add stuff to without having to get community
buy-in.  I have trouble seeing how the wiki doesn't just end up being a
blog of ideas, but I see no harm in it as long as it is clear the items
haven't passed community review.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  EnterpriseDB    http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to