Jim Nasby wrote: > First, +1 on Josh B.'s point about trying out Trac, since it's > already up and running. Josh D., can you just turn that on? (BTW, is > trac linked off http://commandprompt.com anywhere? I had to google to > find it yesterday...) > > On Aug 9, 2006, at 11:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Robert Treat wrote: > >>> Wouldn't a thread reply saying something like "Bruce, can we add > >>> this as a > >>> TODO with the following wording: blah blah blah" likely suffice? > > > > That's pretty much how it's done now ... > > Robert missed the point I was making... there is value in keeping > track of ideas that may not have enough consensus to be a valid TODO > yet, but could still be useful.
It seems some people like the authoritative TODO list, and others want a TODO wiki that they can add stuff to without having to get community buy-in. I have trouble seeing how the wiki doesn't just end up being a blog of ideas, but I see no harm in it as long as it is clear the items haven't passed community review. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
