Robert Treat wrote: > On Saturday 12 August 2006 16:16, David Fetter wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 05:11:03PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:59:45AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > Are we sure we don't want the patch for a non-subquery version of > > > > > > SET ROW for 8.2? > > > > > > > > > > > > o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (...) for updating > > > > > > multiple columns > > > > > > > > > > It seems to be moderately useful as a notational convenience for > > > > > now. > > > > > > > > > > Is it too hard to rip it back out once the full row support > > > > > arrives? That seems speculation at best anyway. > > > > > > > > That's what I was thinking. Glad someone else replied. ;-) > > > > > > If you're looking for votes, +1. I'll gladly take a subset of the > > > SQL standard UPDATE table SET (...) = (...) over having nothing. > > > > +1 here, too. :) > > > > +1
I am working now to get this into 8.2. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
