Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Yeah, that's better wording. Or more correct I think "Windows 2000
> SP4 or above".
>
> FWIW, MS has officially said at some point that they will not make
> SP5 for Windows 2000, but they've changed their minds before...

Unless there actually is a version of that operating system that is not 
labelled "Windows 2000 SP4" that is supported, this expression is 
meaningless.

Note that the list of "supported" platforms in the documentation does 
not make any open interval claims (or any interval claims for that 
matter).

If you know that anything before Windows 2000 SP4 is unsupported, that 
would be useful information, but not the other way around.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to