Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's a close call. On balance I'd be inclined to accept the patch if it
> reviews OK, even though we will throw the code away soon (we hope).
Well, the patch seems pretty ugly code-wise as well. I'd be willing to
clean it up if I thought it wouldn't ultimately get yanked out again,
but I'm not sure that I see the point if we think it's a dead end.
It doesn't come close to applying to CVS HEAD, either :-(
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
