On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:42:11 +0300 Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK, that solves your problem. How about my problem where replication > > has to happen on servers in three countries on two continents and > > thousands of updates a second have to happen in less that 10ms? > > For this scenario you are far better off with partitioning than > replication. > > That is if your data is partitionable. But geographically distributed > data often is.
I agree but in this case it wasn't. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
