Tom Lane wrote: > > My take on all this is that there's no one-size-fits-all replication > solution, and therefore the right approach is to have multiple active > subprojects. Anybody knowing a little about the world of replication needs will agree with you here. Unfortunately, AFAICS pgcluster can't be added as module as e.g. Slony-I, since it's rather a not-so-small patch to the pgsql sources. So I wonder if it's possible to provide some not-too-intrusive hooks in core pgsql, enabling pgcluster to do most of the work in modules, to have the best of both worlds: core with as few modifications as possible, and modules extending the operation, profiting from backend development immediately.
Regards, Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
