Tom Lane wrote: > "Jaime Casanova" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> There's been some talk about prohibiting flattening if there are any > >>> volatile functions in the subselect's targetlist, but nothing's been > >>> done about that. > > > BTW, can you think in a good name for a GUC for this? > > I'm not in favor of a GUC for this; we should either do it or not. > > If we do it, basically the response to anyone who complains about loss > of performance should be "fix your function to be marked stable or > immutable, as appropriate".
Agreed. Are we doing this, or is it a TODO? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
