Mark Dilger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... The argument made upthread that a
> quadratic number of conversion operators is necessitated doesn't seem
> right to me, given that each type could upcast to the canonical built in
> type. (int1 => smallint, int3 => integer, ascii1 => text, ascii2 =>
> text, ascii3 => text, etc.)
This would work all right for the string-category cases, since TEXT is
the only thing you really care about having them cast to anyway.
It probably won't work all that well for int1/int3, because you really
want them to coerce implicitly to all the "wider" numeric types.
Otherwise, perfectly sane queries like "int8 + int1" fail.
Part of the issue here is that we deliberately keep the parser from
searching for multi-step coercions. So for example if you only provide
int1->int2 then the existence of up-casts from int2 doesn't help you
use an int1 with anything except int2.
I am not sure whether any problems would be created if you did provide
the full spectrum of up-casts. I remember having argued that there
would be problems with trying to invent uint2/uint4 types, but that was
a very long time ago, before we had pg_cast and some other changes in
the type resolution rules. With the current system it might work OK.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
