Gregory Stark wrote: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Also Heikki points out here that it would be nice to allow for the case > >> for a > >> 0-byte header. > > > > I don't think there's enough code space for that; at least not compared > > to its use case. > > Well it's irrelevant if we add a special data type to handle CHAR(1).
In that case you should probably be using "char" ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
