Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Point I want to make is - all those are cool features(and might be >> critical for some) but I don't think they warrant a dramatic change in >> the release cycle policy ... > > Any release is going to have some things that are compelling and some > that aren't, for any particular person ... it's just that those things > vary depending on who you are ...
no doubt on that :-) > > I was heard to gripe not long ago that feature freeze during August was > bad timing. It would be interesting to try to do it during the spring > instead, just to see if people have more free time then. So for me, > +1 for a shorter-than-a-year cycle this time, independently of what > features make it or don't. well that is something I can agree too - it is mostly the "do a special release for exactly those 3 features" I don't like that much ... Stefan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org