On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:15:24 -0000 Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-09-15, Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Andrew - Supernews wrote: > >> Numbers from an actual benchmark: > >> > >> int4out(0) - 0.42us/call > >> numeric_out(0) - 0.32us/call > >> > >> int4out(1000000000) - 0.67us/call > >> numeric_out(1000000000) - 0.42us/call > > > > Is this really int4out, or is it int8out? > > int4out. int8out is slower.
int8out is probably a better comparison since it is the same range. -- D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on +1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
