Abhijit Menon-Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 2006-09-05 16:35:49 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> So basically I don't see the point of investing effort in a
>> bug-compatible version of userlocks, when we can have something
>> cleaner and suitable for the long run with not very much more
>> effort.
> Fine with me. Two questions:
> - Where would the code live, if it were in core?
> - Shall I hack up the API you suggested in your earlier message?
Is this going anywhere? The days grow short ...
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
