Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The real question is why does the subtransaction actually assign itself > an XID --- a simple RETURN NEXT operation ought not do that, AFAICS. > What is it you're doing in there that changes the database?
I suspect the answer to that is the same as the answer to what's actually creating the subtransaction. plperl_return_next doesn't. I think something must be doing an actual SPI query, not just a return next. -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
