"Dan Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been having trouble running vacuumdb -a and pg_dumpall
> concurrently because they run through the databases in a different
> order (so dumpall was getting stuck behind vacuum's lock, and my
> firewall was rather unhelpfully closing the idle connection).
Um, whaddya mean "dumpall was getting stuck behind vacuum's lock"?
A plain vacuum doesn't take any locks that would block pg_dump.
While the proposed patch looks harmless enough, I'm unconvinced that
it will solve your problem, or even quite what the problem is.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
