Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> that is the explain for the 4h+ Q9: >> http://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/analyze_q9.txt > > The big problem there seems to be the drastic misestimation of the > number of rows matching the p_name ~~ '%ghost%' condition. What does > pg_stats have for the p_name column?
http://www.kaltenbrunner.cc/files/pg_stat_p_name.txt Stefan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
