> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 September 2006 03:13
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Buildfarm alarms
>
> It could certainly be done. In general, I have generally
> taken the view
> that owners have the responsibility for monitoring their own machines.
> I'll think about it some more.
We are monitoring the machine, however in this case nothing appeared
wrong to the monitoring processes - what had happened was that both had
hung or got in an inifinite loop in ECPG-check, the machine was running
just fine, and a glance at the process list showed everything I'd expect
to see during a normal run. A system for detecting lack of reports from
a member would definitely have helped in this case.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
