"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 05:19:47PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: >> Well, it is already included. The current proposal is simply to >> improve the existing type. I guess you are arguing a different >> proposal altogether - to remove the existing type. > The existing type is depricated and has been since at least 8.1; so yes, > it's slated for removal.
Well, my perception of that has always been "it needs to be upgraded or removed". So if D'Arcy wants to work on the improvement angle, I have no problem with him doing so. The thing we need to negotiate is "how much improvement is needed to keep it in core". regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly