Hi, Tom,

Tom Lane wrote:

>> I miss some info in context: function's oid, function's argumenst and 
>> schema. Maybe:
> 
>> 199292 function public.foo(int, int, int) language plpgsql statement return 
>> line 10
> 
> Putting the OID there is a seriously awful idea, not least because it
> would make it impossible to have stable regression-test outputs.
> 
> I'm not really convinced that we need more than the function name.

I also think that the OID will hurt here, but schema and argument types
may be useful in some corner cases.

Markus

-- 
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf.     | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to