Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > That's quite possible that there is a fair amount of dead code in there > because it was originally the header for the lztext datatype, which if > memory served only existed quietly in one release to support slightly > larger rewrite rules before it was replaced with TOAST.
Ah, I was wondering how so much of it came to be dead code, but that explains that. I will pull out whatever's not referenced anymore --- it looks like there are a couple of subroutines, not just macros, that we don't need. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly