Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 06:26:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > Funny, sounds like what I usually do. I welcome the assistance. > > Well, yes, that was my impression too. The complaint in the thread > that started all this, as I understood it, was that there were big, > hairy features that tended to have long discussions about them, and > very few people among even the committers seemed to have a clear idea > of exactly where things stood at the end of coding.
Yep. I think Tom and I have a clear picture, but we aren't make it visible enough, I guess. One idea I had was to either create a web page or add to the top of the TODO items that are currently being worked on. > But I take Jim Nasby's point, that the request for monitoring isn't > going to come. How about an alternative: _you_ delegate > threads/features/whatever to me to watch? Would that help? (I don't > care how we do it, so long as it would be helpful and so long as it's > wanted.) I do think we need a structure for this to be valuable. We can perhaps use a wiki to track open development items, with some status, like I did for the open items list for 8.2. I usually only do that during feature freeze, but could expand it and open it up for others to edit. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
