Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > >> IIRC it was made a non-fatal warning somewhere near the end of the > >> output, but I'm not sure... > > > It spits out this line just before it creates its output files: > > *** Option ignored: --with-lkjasdf > > Of course, since it spits out pages and pages of normally-useless trivia, > we've all become conditioned to ignore configure's output as long as it > doesn't actually fail :-( > > Not sure what to do about that --- I doubt that raising this warning to > error would be a good idea, seeing how firmly the upstream developers > believe it shouldn't even be a warning. Is there any sort of "quiet > mode" possible that would report only warnings? Would it be a good idea > if it were possible?
I think one idea is a "pedantic" mode that fails if an unrecognized option is supplied. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
