On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 06:43:43PM +0100, Lexington Luthor wrote:
> With a bit of careful planning (and a few SELECT FOR UPDATE queries to
> prevent deadlock), having perfect consistency and correct caching is
> possible.
I didn't respond directly to this claim of yours.
SELECT FOR UPDATE is only useful if I'm going to do SELECT. If I am
using memcache, one would presume that I am using it in place of
SELECT, to improve performance. If I'm going to SELECT and then
memcache, I haven't gained anything.
Cheers,
mark
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________
. . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ |
| | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them...
http://mark.mielke.cc/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
