On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 13:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is it worth renaming our qsort to pg_qsort to avoid this? (I'd be
> inclined to do that via a macro "#define qsort pg_qsort", not by running
> around and changing all the code.)
Why not change each call site? I don't think it would hurt to be clear
about the fact that we're calling our own sorting function, not the
platform's libc qsort().
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
