On 10/18/06, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> wrote:
Async i/o is stably supported on most *nix (apart from Linux 2.6.*) plus Windows.
Guess it would be still worth it, since one fine day 2.6.* will start supporting it properly too.
Regards,
Nikhils
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 08:04:29PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >"bgwriter doing aysncronous I/O for the dirty buffers that it is
> >supposed to sync"
> >Another decent use-case?
Good idea, but async i/o is generally poorly supported.
Async i/o is stably supported on most *nix (apart from Linux 2.6.*) plus Windows.
Regards,
Nikhils
> Is it worth considering using readv(2) instead?
Err, readv allows you to split a single consecutive read into multiple
buffers. Doesn't help at all for reads on widely areas of a file.
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFNhtyIB7bNG8LQkwRApNAAJ9mOhEaFqU59HRCCoJS9k9HCZZl5gCdHDWt
FurlswevGH4CWErsjcWmwVk=
=sQoa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
All the world's a stage, and most of us are desperately unrehearsed.
