Hi, Cesar, Cesar Suga wrote: > If people (who read the documentation) professionally work with > PostgreSQL, they may already have been briefed by those commercial > offerings in some way. > > I think only the source and its tightly coupled (read: can compile along > with, free as PostgreSQL) components should be packaged into the tarball. > > However, I find Bruce's unofficial wiki idea a good one for comparisons.
My suggestion is that the docs should mention only the pure existence of important third-party packages and projects in those places where it talks about the deficits that are supposedly fixed by those. E. G. "There are some third-party packages and projects that aim to provide multi-master replication, you can search for more information at http://[unofficial wiki page url] or your favourite search engine. This way, the docs stay neutral, but point the user to possible solutions of his problem. HTH, Markus -- Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature