On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:23:27PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Right - I think the regression is caused by libc and kernel being built > > with gcc 3.4.6 and the test program being built with gcc 4.1.2. > > Why do you think that? The performance of the CRC loop shouldn't depend > at all on either libc or the kernel, because they're not invoked inside > the loop. >
I can believe that not re-building GCC 4.1.x with the 4.1.x compiler could result in it not taking full advantage of new features and functions. Ken ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly