I've reposted this from pgsql-performance where I got no response.
==========================================
Hi,
I wanted to use "exp1 is not distinct from exp2" which I tough was syntaxic
sugar for
exp1 is not null and exp2 is not null and exp1 = exp2 or exp1 is null and
exp2 is null
but my index is ignored with "is not distinct from".
Is this the expected behavior ?
create temporary table t as select * from generate_series(1,1000000) t(col);
create unique index i on t(col);
analyze t;
-- These queries don't use the index
select count(*) from t where col is not distinct from 123;
select count(*) from t where not col is distinct from 123;
-- This query use the index
select count(*) from t where col is not null and 123 is not null and col =
123 or col is null and 123 is null;
explain analyze select count(*) from t where col is not distinct from 123;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=19154.79..19154.80 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=228.200..228.202 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t (cost=0.00..17904.90 rows=499956 width=0) (actual
time=0.042..228.133 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (NOT (col IS DISTINCT FROM 123))
Total runtime: 228.290 ms
(4 rows)
Time: 219.000 ms
explain analyze select count(*) from t where not col is distinct from 123;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=19154.79..19154.80 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=235.950..235.952 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on t (cost=0.00..17904.90 rows=499956 width=0) (actual
time=0.040..235.909 rows=1 loops=1)
Filter: (NOT (col IS DISTINCT FROM 123))
Total runtime: 236.065 ms
(4 rows)
Time: 250.000 ms
explain analyze select count(*) from t where col is not null and 123 is not
null and col = 123 or col is null and 123 is null;
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=8.13..8.14 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=0.267..0.268 rows=1
loops=1)
-> Index Scan using i on t (cost=0.00..8.13 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=0.237..0.241 rows=1 loops=1)
Index Cond: (col = 123)
Total runtime: 0.366 ms
(4 rows)
Time: 0.000 ms
I am on Windows XP Service pack 2 with PostgreSQL 8.2 beta2
Thanks,
Jean-Pierre Pelletier
e-djuster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org