On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 14:47 -0500, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > vacuum_freeze_min The latest TransactionId that will be "frozen" during > > a VACUUM is calculated by CurrentTransactionId - vacuum_freeze_min. > > > > vacuum_freeze_max > > The maximum age, calculated as distance from CurrentTransactionId, that > > will be allowed before a autovacuum will be forced for that database > > object. > > I think it's clearer if "min" and "max" are considered adjectives and always > have a subject they modify. Otherwise it's unclear what they refer to. > > So "vacuum_freeze_min_age" and "vacuum_freeze_max_age" instead. > > That way it's unambiguous which is which. Ie, that it's minimum and maximum > age and not minimum and maximum transaction id which would be the other way > around.
Sounds logical. Hadn't seen that you could take it both ways. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
