Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right. Here's the patch I just knocked up, which seems to Just Work (tm) ;-)
The main objection I can see to this is that you'd get a fairly unhelpful message if you intended a conninfo string and there was anything wrong with your syntax (eg, misspelled keyword). Maybe we should go with the conn: bit, although really that doesn't seem any less likely to collide with actual dbnames than the "does it contain "="" idea. Anyone have other ideas how to disambiguate? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings