On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:52:12PM -0500, Brian Hurt wrote: > Joachim Wieland wrote:
> >Yes, I completely agree that JDT should not be included. I just wanted to > >understand how those lines show that JST is still in active use. As far as > >I > >understand it, it says that JST was observed from 1948 to 1951 (the second > >rule) and now there is a time zone "J%sT" (because there is no "until"-date > >in the last line) but there is no rule that tells us what to replace "%s" > >with... > We're using JST as a time zone here, so I'd like to politely request > that JST stay in the list of time zones, wether it is an "official" time > zone or not. Thanks. No objection Brian, everybody agrees to put it back into the list of time zones. I'm just trying to find out why it isn't there already. I think that the missing rule (better: the rule that i think is missing) might be the reason for why the conversion script that I used at that time did not output it as a timezone that is still active. Joachim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org