Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Actually, the more I think about it the more I think that 3 numbers >> might be the answer. 99% of the code would use only the permanent ID.
> Don't we already have such a permanent number -- just one we don't use > anywhere in the data model? Namely the oid of the pg_attribute entry. Nope, because pg_attribute hasn't got OIDs. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings