"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, Tom Lane does not like how invasive the patch is.
If GNUTLS really wants to take market share from OpenSSL, why don't they
provide a more nearly compatible API? I don't see why we should have
to jump through so many hoops in order to satify someone else's license
fetish. (And it is a fetish, because only a compulsively narrow-minded
reading of the licenses yields the conclusion that there's a problem.)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
