* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Stephen Frost wrote: > > I appriciate your pedantism but in the end it really doesn't matter very > > much. This is, aiui anyway, the way Debian interprets the various > > licenses. You're welcome to your own interpretation. > > That was my point --- that it isn't clear what "additional restrictions" > are, and that an advertizing clause or additional license can be > interpreted as the same thing.
The point, from Debian's perspective anyway, is that they're *not* the
same thing and one is an 'additional restriction' while the other isn't.
It's pretty clear that the GPL has a clause requiring the distribution
of the license associated with the work while it has no clause which
requires statements in advertising material.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
