David Boreham wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:

* David Boreham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Fascinating thread for the holidays. I found it interesting that nobody has mentioned NSS (former Netscape SSL library). It has its own bag of problems of course, but for me is potentially more attractive than GNU TLS. e.g. it has FIPS-140 certification and is actively under development by a software company with significant resources. It's also very widely deployed. I'm not saying that OpenSSL is bad (it'd probably be my
first choice), just that there is another option besides GNU TLS.

Not sure what license that's under,

From http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/:
'NSS is available under the Mozilla Public License, the GNU General Public License, and the GNU Lesser General Public License.'


I suspect most postgres developers and companies would like to keep things as BSDish as possible. Dealing with a multitude of licenses might be fun for some, but many of us find it a pain in the neck.

Also, do we really want to import the NSPR into Postgres? I suspect not. Of course, the only thing that people are tripping over license-wise is libpq. But I think we would want to keep that as lean and mean as possible, too.

cheers

andrew


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
      choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
      match

Reply via email to