Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new > contributors)?\ > Maybe.
> If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code > saying why would make sense. > I don't see a strong reason for not to do it. But if you look closely at the postgres binaries you'll notice some "inconsistencies" e.g., pg_ctl doesn't have long options, pg_config doesn't have short options, postgres almost don't have long options. I agree that it deserves a cleanup but I don't know if it's worth to do. -- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
