Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Might be more robust to say
>>> if (trace_temp_files >= 0)
> I specified in the GUC config that minimum allowable value is -1.
I'd still tend to go with Andrew's suggestion because it makes this
particular bit of code self-defending against bad values. Yes, it's
reasonably safe given that bit of coding way over yonder in guc.c,
but there's no particularly good reason why this code has to depend
on that to avoid doing something stupid. And it's easier to understand
too --- you don't have to go looking in guc.c to convince yourself it's
safe.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
