Tom Lane wrote:
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
From: Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think forking a separate
pg_dump for each database is a perfectly fine arrangement, and should be
left alone.
Hmm, would you be happy with my original proposal to add an append option to
pg_dump?
I don't object to it in principle, but I think a bit more thought is
needed as to what's the goal. A stupid "append" option would be enough
for pg_dumpall's current capabilities (ie, text output only) --- but is
it reasonable to consider generalizing -Fc and -Ft modes to deal with
multiple databases, and if so how would that need to change pg_dump's
API? (I'm not at all sure this is feasible, but let's think about it
before plastering warts onto pg_dump, not after.)
Hmm, OK. I'll need to have a good look at the code before I can even
think about commenting on that, which will have to wait until after I've
finished bundling releases.
Regards, Dave
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
