Josh Berkus wrote: > All, > > Hey, is there any good reason why FSM is sized by a static GUC variable? > Why couldn't we just automatically have the system use as much memory as > it needs for FSM, provided that it's not more than some reasonable limit, > like 15% of shared memory? > > Seems like that would eliminate one area of user confusion, as well as > over-allocation.
I don't think any of our shared memory segments auto-size. What would you take memory from to increase FSM? -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
