Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IIRC Tom's main objection to the previous proposal was that it involved
large grammar changes, which I understand is not now proposed.
No, they're already in there --- the patch seems to have been written
according to that proposal despite the objections.
Oh. ouch.
That seems strange given this query from Oleg back on 18 Nov:
So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in core ?
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
